Antigone's AP Essay Prompt
1999: The
eighteenth-century British novelist Laurence Stern wrote, "Nobody, but he
who has felt it, can conceive what a plaguing thing it is to have a man's mind
torn asunder by two projects of equal strength, both obstinately pulling in a
contrary direction at the same time."
From Antigone choose a character (not
necessarily the protagonist) whose mind is pulled in conflicting directions by
two compelling desires, ambitions, obligations, or influences. Then, in a
well-organized essay, identify each of the two conflicting forces and explain
how this conflict within one character illuminates the meaning of a work as a
whole. Avoid plot summary.
__________
In Sophocles’ “Antigone”, Creon, the new king of Thebes,
has his mind pulled on two different directions in front of a conflict. After
his niece tries bury her brother, who has betrayed Thebes, Creon orders for the
traitor to be killed, until he learns that it’s his niece who has committed the
crime. Creon now faces a moral conflict, with two sides of equal strength, either
to appear strong and determined as the new king of Thebes, or to follow his
heart and pardon his niece’s life.
Creon’s
first reaction to hearing of this crime is of rage. He’s very upset towards
this criminal, until he learns that it’s his own niece, Antigone, who has
committed this terrible act. He has just become the new king of Thebes, and
wants to be seen as a strong leader by his new people, but his heart thinks
otherwise. Through Sophocles’ description of Creon’s emotions, we see that he
is deeply concerned about being an unmovable and capable leader for his people.
While
Creon tries to maintain his position as robust king, he’s also profoundly
worried about his niece, Antigone. Creon feels a very strong bond towards her,
both as her niece and fiancée of his son. However, this feeling is not
reciprocal, as Antigone seems stoic, almost like she doesn’t care about being executed
at all. This family connection affects Creon’s opinions about the sentence for
Antigone, and makes it very hard for him to make a decision.
Creon’s
internal conflict it’s a very humane one, and is relatable to most of us
readers. Every time we make a decision between two plausible outcomes we face
this conflict, to choose one alternative or the other. Creon’s case is especially
appealing to readers since his conflict doesn’t really have a ‘right’ choice.
Both alternatives have its pros and its cons. It’s the socially correct
alternative against the morally correct one.
No comments:
Post a Comment